Giải Pháp IELTS Cho Người Mất Gốc

Giải đề thi thật IELTS WRITING TASK 2 ngày 16/01/2021 – TOPIC FAMILY

Writing chủ đề Family là một trong những topic hiếm gặp trong các đề thi IELTS. Đối với bài viết này bạn nên viết theo phong cách đơn giản và cách viết cần phải mạch lạc dễ hiểu. Ngoài ra, các bạn khi viết cần nắm rõ cách sử dụng từ vựng và sắp xếp ý tưởng phù hợp đề có thể đạt được Band 7+.

Question (Đề IELTS WRITING TASK 2 ngày 16/01/2021)
More and more adults are continuing to live at home with their parents in some countries after they have completed education and found jobs. Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages?
In the last few decades, there have been some modifications in the family structure and relationship; yet there still has a trend that greater numbers of adults opting to reside with their parents after graduation and securing a job. While the benefits seem to be stopgap, I believe the drawbacks involved are significant.
There are several significant merits as adults return to parental homes. It is undoubted that saving money is the first benefit.  In other words, people can save on rent, utility bills, renovations, shared grocery bills, and many more. Of course, people should be contributing to the household expenses, but they will not have to spend as much as they would if they were on their own.  Another potential benefit is that people can have more free time. Living in a multigenerational setting means that there are a lot more hands to the work. Further, living with their parents usually comes with the added benefit of enjoying warm, home-cooked meals even when people do not have time to cook.
Despite some benefits above, I deem that the negatively far-reaching impacts outnumber the positives it induces.  Firstly, living with their parents can strip people of their privacy or freedom, and that can be a psychological burden, especially if they are used to living alone. Their parents may likely intervene in one’s lives, like when to sleep or eat or what can do at home. Secondly, those who select this lifestyle may be less independent. By living with their parents, people are shielding themselves not only from hardships but also from the lessons life has to offer. Eventually, they may fail to manage themselves as moving out, living alone, and could turn out to be a shockingly unpleasant experience since they tend to count on their guardians beforehand.
In short, although living at home with their caregivers may provide adults with some advantageous factors, such as financial betterment and gaining time, I opine that the side effects it causes are more serious. This temporary lifestyle may not assist people in preparing for everyday struggles in the future.
LANGUAGE
Modifications: changes
Reside with: live with
Stopgap: temporary/short term
Parental homes: parents’ houses
Household expenses: chi phí trong nhà
Multigenerational (adj): nhiều thế hệ
The negatively far-reaching impacts: những tác động sâu rộng mang tính tiêu cực
Induce/cause/lead to/result in/trigger
Strip of: remove
A psychological burden: gánh nặng tâm lý
Intervene in: can thiệp (interfere with)
 Shielding/protecting
A shockingly unpleasant experience: trải nghiệm không thoải mái sock
Count on/ rely on: ỷ lại
Guardians/caregivers/parents
Financial betterment and gaining time: tốt hơn về tài chính và tiết kiệm thời gian
Everyday struggles: tranh đấy mỗi ngày

 

CÁC BÀI ESSAY MẪU KHÁC CHỦ ĐỀ FAMILY 

Essay 1:

In recent years, the structure of a family and the role of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive or negative?

Model 1

In the last few decades, the family’s structure and its members have changed significantly due to the effects of modernization. There are some modifications in the relationship between wives and husbands or between parents and children, and I believe that these changes will bring both positive and adverse effects to our society.

Some changes can be seen in many families.  Firstly, a family usually has fewer people than it used to do. For example, in the past, it was not difficult to find extended families with a few generations living together in Viet Nam; however, the nuclear ones are much more popular now. Couples also tend to have one or two children instead of three or more. Secondly, the role of each person in families has significant changes. The wife plays a more important role in the family. A good example is that a lot of women are the backbone of their family by their abilities to earn money, while many men are willing to have responsibilities for taking care of children or doing housework. In some families, both wife and husband would like to pursue their own career, so hiring charwomen is a perfect choice not only to help them do housewifery but also to look after their children.

In my opinion, all transformations mentioned above could lead to adverse effects as well as positive ones. It is possible that a nuclear family would bring more comfortable living conditions to all members, nevertheless, in the future, children would have to struggle to take care of their parents. Besides, if children are given too many rights or privileges, they probably will be selfish or rude rather than reach a comprehensive development as their parents expect. In addition, the generation gap between parents and children has been increasing. Children will have a stronger voice to discuss the family’s problem or decisions and sometimes this practice can lead to family conflicts.

In conclusion, there are a variety of changes in the family structure and the responsibility of each member, which can cause positive or downside influences. It is time for all people to recognize these modifications and pay more attention to their family.

Model 2:

Nowadays, factors of an ordinary family are witnessing some steady changes. Some fundamental adjustments of the modern families can be expected and I think that these modifications are both beneficial and disadvantageous.

There are two main types of changes that occur in family construction. Initially, the size of the family tends to be tailed off. It is obvious that in the past, a usual family used to consist of at least three generations. However, in modern life, the most prevalent type of family is a nuclear family, which only includes a maximum of two generations: parents and children. Moreover, people apparently give birth less than they did before and the appearances of the childless couples are more frequent. This change has both advantages and disadvantages. By reducing the numbers of offspring, parents are capable of taking care of their children more carefully. Nonetheless, this tendency could disconnect people with their ancestors because they do not have enough opportunities to be close to the previous generations

Secondly, there is also a dramatic change in the responsibility of each family member to the others. Previously, especially in Eastern society, everyone had to obey everything talked by their parents whatever right or wrong. Nowadays, although every child has duties to respect their parents, they have right to make arguments with their fathers and mothers when they feel doubt with their parents’ statements. This adjustment, of course, is very conducive to the children’s development in the family. However, there are some cases that the children use this right to be rude or offend their parents

In conclusion, I believe that the mentioned transformations are conducive to family development because their benefits are obvious and cannot be denied, while their detrimental effects are insignificant. Moreover, disastrous impacts also occurred in traditional families, so they can be only attributed to the transition of the modern family.

Essay 2

Some people prefer to live in small family units, while others think it is better to live in large family groups. Discuss both views and give your opinion?

It has been debated that whether people should live in nuclear family or individuals should live in an extended family. While the latter may suits some, I am inclined to support the former.

There are several advantages for some individuals to live in a large family group. Firstly, parents can be a role model for their children to look up to through several actions such as taking care of grandparents, which helps their offspring develop a sense of responsibility and respects their family. As a result, living with the elderly helps to create a strong family relationship/ bond. Second, since there are many beloved family members, people can give a helping hand to do housework. For instance, if parents have to finish all of the work obligations, grandparents might help to care for/ look after their grandchildren.

There are a number of benefits that many people and I prefer living in small family units. Firstly, by having more quality/ valuable time to do what people really want to do such as traveling for long distance trip or learning something special, these individuals living in small families could be much freer. For example, children living in an elementary family would be more independent, which plays an important role in their adulthood. In addition, retired people should live far away from their adult children, which reduces the financial burden on young generations/ youngsters. In fact, if the young adults live together with their parents, they will have to shoulder the responsibility to take care of the elderly and their pressure will become heavier.

In conclusion, while living in the large family group can be positive to some extent, I believe that living in a nuclear family can have more benefits.

 

👉 Các bạn có thể nhấn vào link này để tham khảo thêm nhiều bài viết khác từ IELTS Lingo nhé:
 
——————————-
ℹ️ LINGO CONNECTOR ℹ️
Hotline: 0933848596 ZALO 0976 461778
#lingoconnector #studyenglish #ieltsgeneral #tiếng_anh_cho_người_định_cư #luyện_thi_ielts #ielts_lingo #ieltslingo 
Thiết kế website bởi webmoi.vn