Lingo Connector chia sẻ cùng các bạn sỹ tử Bài mẫu IELTS writing Task 2 ngày 28/11/2020. Bài viết dưới đây được biên soạn bởi thầy Dane là Tiến Sỹ tốt nghiệp Mỹ. Bộ bài mẫu này sẽ giúp các bạn đang luyện IELTS writing có thể tham khảo và áp dụng ý tưởng, từ vựng trong bài mẫu vào quá trình luyện Writing hiệu quả.
Question: Government should make laws about people’s nutrition and food choice. Other argue that is their choice. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Many people believe that there should be laws to restrict (limit) the consumption of certain types of food. Others, however, argue that people should be able to make their own decision as to what food they can eat. Although people should have freedom for most of their food-related preferences, I opine with the former viewpoint that under certain circumstances, governmental intervention is necessary.
Many people assert that they should have the freedom to enjoy any kind of diet. Different food has a negative or positive impact on consumers ‘well-being, but this does not mean the government can use its authority to interfere with people’s decision making for fear that they make the wrong choice. Educating people about healthy diets could be a better alternative. Moreover, healthy foods or not are seen differently since people have various eating preferences and financial situations’. In other words, it depends on one’s lifestyle and conditions to pursue their personal level of healthiness. Rigorous bans on all unhealthy foods would consequentially disrupt (affect negatively) people’s lives on the account of the fact (because of) that they ought to adjust their eating habits, which is undesirable sometimes.
However, strict laws should be imposed on the food manufacturing industry before food products reach consumers. Food safety regulations are in place to ensure that all ingredients in food products do not contain hazardous substances that may pose threats to people’s health. Such laws also guarantee that food manufacturers provide transparent information on sources, nutrition contents, and possible health risks. Furthermore, many countries prohibit (ban) making food from wild animals for fear of communicable diseases or preservation efforts. Such prohibitions benefit society as a whole and so should not be controversial.
In conclusion, while it is certainly the case that consumers should be able to purchase a variety of edible (eatable) products, I deem that the government needs to ensure that life-threatening food items cannot make their way to people’s shopping bags. Food made from endangered species should be inhibited (banned) from consumption as well.
Thao khảo thêm về chủ đề writing tại đây
Xem thêm: TOPIC SHOPPING, TOPIC BUSINESS , TOPIC ART
LINGO CONNECTOR
195/14 Xô Viết Nghệ Tĩnh, p17, Q. Bình Thạnh.
Hotline: 0287 303 8596
